A Call for Pragmatism in Nigeria’s State Structure

As a citizen deeply invested in the progress of Nigeria, I respectfully submit my position on the ongoing constitutional review concerning the creation of additional states. Speaking from the humble lens of a “village boy,” I must emphasize that I am not in support of adding more states to the Nigerian federation.

While I acknowledge the sentiments and genuine agitations driving the calls for new states, I believe that Nigeria’s long-term progress will be better served by restructuring the country into six geopolitical regions—South East, South West, South South, North East, North West, and North Central. Each of these six regions would operate as a state, with only six governors, and the presidency rotating every five years across the six geopolitical zones. This approach would drastically reduce administrative waste, promote unity, and redirect focus to regional development.

Historically, Nigeria witnessed its most rapid development during the regional government era. In contrast, the current structure of 36 states has proven to be inefficient and economically unsustainable. Many of these states struggle to meet basic obligations, relying heavily on federal allocations. As a matter of economic reality, the dividend Alhaji Aliko Dangote receives from his private enterprise often exceeds the annual budgets of several states in Nigeria. This underscores how fiscally fragile our state system has become.

In conclusion, multiplying the number of states without instituting governance based on pragmatism, integrity, and meritocracy will yield no tangible progress. Even if Nigeria is divided into 150 states, the absence of effective and visionary leadership will mean stagnation. Our priority should not be in expanding political boundaries, but in reimagining the structure of governance to drive sustainable development and inclusive prosperity.

—

Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA (Sep 15 – Dec 6, 2025), and join Prof Ndubuisi Ekekwe and our global faculty; click here.