China Imposes 100% Tariffs on Selected Canadian Imports

China announced the imposition of 100% tariffs on select Canadian imports, including rapeseed oil, oil cakes, and peas, effective March 20, 2025. Additionally, a 25% tariff was imposed on Canadian pork and aquatic products. This move was in retaliation to Canada’s earlier imposition of a 100% surtax on Chinese-made electric vehicles and a 25% tariff on Chinese steel and aluminum products in October 2024. China’s actions are part of escalating global trade tensions, exacerbated by similar tariff measures from the United States and other Western countries, aimed at countering what they describe as unfair trade practices by China, such as state subsidies and overcapacity.

These tariffs, enacted in retaliation to Canada’s earlier duties on Chinese electric vehicles, steel, and aluminum, target key Canadian export sectors, particularly agriculture and food products, with a total trade value exceeding $2.6 billion annually. Below is an analysis of the potential economic consequences, based on available information and broader economic principles. Canada’s agricultural exports to China, including canola, were valued at around $3.7 billion in 2023, with China being a critical market for products like canola, where over half of Canada’s exports are directed.

The exclusion of canola from the current tariff list may mitigate some damage, possibly as a strategic move by China to keep trade negotiations open, but the ongoing anti-dumping investigation into Canadian canola imports signals potential future risks. A severe contraction in this market could lead to a GDP reduction of 0.5% to 1%, with potential job losses ranging from 50,000 to 100,000 in agriculture and related manufacturing sectors, according to speculative analyses.

The broader economic implications extend beyond agriculture. Canada’s economy is heavily reliant on exports, with trade accounting for 67% of its GDP, and China being its second-largest trading partner, with $47 billion in goods exported in 2024. The tariff-induced disruption of $14.2 billion in annual trade with China, as suggested by some estimates, could exacerbate inflationary pressures by increasing the cost of imports and reducing export competitiveness. This is particularly concerning given the concurrent U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods, implemented under President Trump, which impose a 25% duty on most imports and a 10% duty on energy resources.

These U.S. tariffs alone could cost Canadian households approximately $1,000 annually in higher prices, amplifying the economic strain from China’s actions. The combined effect of these trade barriers could push Canada toward stagflation, characterized by stagnant economic growth and rising inflation, especially if businesses pass on higher costs to consumers.
The Canadian government has responded proactively, committing over C$6 billion to mitigate the impact of U.S. tariffs and explore new markets, which may also help cushion the blow from China’s tariffs.

However, the effectiveness of these measures remains uncertain, as finding alternative markets for specialized agricultural products like rapeseed oil and peas is challenging in the short term, given China’s dominant role as a buyer. Moreover, retaliatory tariffs from Canada, such as the immediate 25% duties on $30 billion of U.S. goods and planned tariffs on an additional $125 billion, could further complicate trade dynamics, potentially escalating costs and disrupting supply chains across North America. This tit-for-tat escalation risks long-term damage to Canada’s export-reliant economy, particularly in sectors like automotive and manufacturing, which are highly integrated with the U.S. and vulnerable to trade disruptions.

It’s critical to consider the broader context of global trade tensions. China’s tariffs are not only a response to Canada but also a signal within the larger U.S.-led trade war, where Canada’s alignment with American policies, such as tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, has drawn Beijing’s ire. Some analysts interpret China’s actions as a warning shot, leveraging its economic clout to pressure Canada while managing multiple trade disputes with the U.S. and the European Union.

This strategic signaling suggests that China may be holding back on more severe measures, such as including canola in the tariff list, to maintain leverage in future negotiations. However, the ongoing canola investigation could serve as a latent threat, potentially devastating an industry already reeling from past trade disputes with China.

The resilience of Canada’s economy will depend on several factors, including its ability to diversify export markets, the outcome of trade negotiations, and the stability of its financial system. While some speculate about severe outcomes, such as Canada facing bankruptcy, these claims are exaggerated. Canada’s diversified economy, with a strong services sector and significant trade with the U.S., provides a buffer against such extreme scenarios. Nonetheless, the combined pressure from China’s and the U.S.’s tariffs could strain economic growth, increase unemployment, and reduce investor confidence, particularly if the Canadian dollar weakens further, raising the cost of imports and fueling inflation.

China’s tariffs on select Canadian imports are likely to cause significant economic disruption, particularly in agriculture, with ripple effects on GDP, employment, and consumer prices. When combined with U.S. tariffs, the impact could be more severe, potentially pushing Canada into a period of economic stagnation and inflation. However, Canada’s proactive fiscal measures and strategic trade policies may mitigate some of the damage, though the long-term outlook depends on de-escalating trade tensions and diversifying export dependencies.