BYD, the Chinese electric‑vehicle maker, is offering full coverage for its self‑parking feature. If it fails, even due to a software glitch, BYD will cover the repair costs, pay for any property damage, and take care of injury claims.
BYD posted the pledge on Weibo, saying it fully trusts its God’s Eye ADAS. No other automaker has ever made a promise like this.
BYD’s assurance may reshape how carmakers handle responsibility for self‑driving features.
It stands in stark contrast to Tesla’s Full Self‑Driving (FSD) software. Although FSD suggests full autonomy, Tesla markets it as a beta tool that still requires drivers to keep their hands on the wheel and watch the road. The electric carmaker reminds users repeatedly that they, not the company, bear legal liability if anything goes wrong.
Instead of just rolling out new features, BYD says you’ll have real legal options if it breaks—something almost no other consumer self‑driving system offers. With this commitment, BYD aims to build a foundation of legal and financial trust.
Regulators and safety experts have long cautioned that automakers are rolling out self‑driving tools before sorting out how to assign fault when systems fail. For years, policymakers and consumer groups have argued that safety standards have lagged behind the rapid rollout of autonomous aids.
BYD’s offering could become the first practical example of shifting responsibility away from drivers and onto the manufacturer. The decision may send ripples through the industry. If one automaker is ready to back Level 4‑style parking with real money, others may face pressure to follow suit or risk looking irresponsible.
BYD’s global expansion could reshape industry rules
At present, BYD’s coverage promise applies solely within China. Yet with the brand growing rapidly across Western and Latin American markets, many wonder whether the pledge will follow overseas.
The question of international rollout comes as BYD challenges industry norms at home. Its rapid gains in overseas EV sales underscore the pressure it could place on Western markets.
If BYD extends the promise to markets in the U.S. and EU, regulators there may have to rethink rules for autonomous systems. It could also push global rivals, such as Tesla, Mercedes‑Benz, and GM, to match BYD’s level of accountability or face criticism from buyers.
If one carmaker backs AI mistakes with its own money, why can’t the rest?
BYD’s latest commitment could change who answers for mistakes when AI takes the wheel. In a field where most brands treat autonomous features as something buyers must use at their own risk, this promise is both unusual and daring—and it puts BYD’s own capital on the line to earn consumer trust.
BYD doesn’t make drivers sign any waivers or legal disclaimers. Instead, it puts its money where its mouth is, using its own funds to prove it believes in the technology. This approach could mark a turning point in the race for safer, more reliable self‑driving systems.
KEY Difference Wire: the secret tool crypto projects use to get guaranteed media coverage
