GPT-5 is here, and so is the backlash.
Within days of launch, the internet was buzzing:
“It’s slower.”
“Feels less creative.”
“I’m switching back to GPT-4.”
If you’re an entrepreneur, creator, or marketer, this isn’t just background noise. It’s a red flag.
Because here’s the truth:
If your GPT-5 outputs suck, it’s probably not the model.
It’s you — or more precisely, the way you’re prompting it.
The Prompt Gap, Explained
The Prompt Gap is the difference between what GPT-5 can do and what most users actually get out of it.
It happens when:
- You type vague prompts and get vague results.
- You “test” the model with one or two generic queries, then declare it underwhelming.
- You tinker endlessly without producing anything publish-ready.
In other words: the model’s potential is massive. But you’re only scratching the surface.
The Backlash Pattern I’ve Seen Before
This isn’t unique to GPT-5. I’ve seen it with every major LLM release:
- GPT-3.5: People were amazed for a week, then frustrated by inconsistencies.
- GPT-4: People loved the creativity, then complained about “hallucinations” and “weird tone.”
- GPT-4.5: Early testers swore it was “dumber” than GPT-4.
The cycle is predictable:
- Hype spike → Everyone rushes in.
- First impressions → Quick tests, generic prompts.
- Disappointment phase → “It’s not what I expected.”
- Skill separation → A small percentage figure it out and dominate.
We’re in Stage 3 right now with GPT-5. Stage 4 is coming and whether you make the cut depends on how fast you close the Prompt Gap.
Why the Prompt Gap Hurts in the Early-Adopter Window
Today we’re in GPT-5’s early-adopter window. This is the short, high-leverage phase where the fastest learners pull ahead and everyone else gets left behind.
But the overall AI adoption has reached the Early Majority (34%). The ecosystem (ChatGPT, Gemini, Meta, Grok, Claude 3.5, Rufus, Mistral, etc.) is in the “serious tool” stage.
AI is no longer just a novelty. It’s embedded in:
- Microsoft Office, Google Workspace, Notion, Canva, HubSpot
- Customer support automation
- Mainstream marketing teams’ content pipelines
Many professionals use AI daily. But most still under-optimize their results (the Prompt Gap).
If you close the gap now, you:
-
Launch products faster than competitors can react.
-
Publish before others even figure out their workflows.
-
Own thought-leadership space in your niche while it’s still open.
If you don’t? That window closes.
The playing field levels, and GPT-5 becomes just another “tool you’re still figuring out.”
How the Prompt Gap Plays Out for Different Groups
-
Entrepreneurs → Slower product launches, missed funding opportunities, weaker investor updates.
-
Marketers → Campaigns miss cultural moments, brand voice diluted, competitors dominate feeds.
-
Creators → Algorithmic boosts wasted, audience growth stalls, loyalty shifts elsewhere.
I’ve Been on Both Sides of This
When I started using ChatGPT in 2022, I made all the rookie mistakes:
- Ten drafts for one blog intro.
- Forty-five minutes “training” it for a single LinkedIn post.
- Wondering if the hype was just marketing fluff.
It wasn’t.
Over 18 months of daily LLM use, I learned the outputs weren’t bad because the AI was bad. They were bad because my inputs were bad.
When I fixed my prompting, everything changed:
-
Blog posts in under an hour.
-
A month of LinkedIn content in one sitting.
-
Full lead magnets and product copy — no outside hires.
Prompting Like It’s 2022 Won’t Cut It in 2025
Back in the GPT-3.5 days, just getting the model to produce anything coherent felt like a win.
Now? The baseline is much higher:
- Your prompts have to reflect your brand, style, and audience.
- Your workflows have to produce publish-ready material fast.
- You can’t just “throw a question at it” and expect gold.
If you prompt GPT-5 like it’s still 2022, you’ll get 2022-level outputs. In a 2025-level market.
Bad Prompt vs. Good Prompt (The Side-by-Side)
Here’s a real example from my own work.
Bad Prompt:
“Write a blog post about remote work.”
Result:
Generic, bland, indistinguishable from any other AI blog post.
Good Prompt:
“You are a workplace trends analyst writing for a B2B SaaS audience of HR leaders.
Draft a 1,200-word article on remote work’s impact on team productivity.
Include at least 3 data points from recent surveys.
Structure with an intro, 3 key sections, and a conclusion.
Match the tone of Harvard Business Review’s leadership articles.”Result:
A highly targeted, source-rich, well-structured draft that needed minimal editing.
The difference wasn’t GPT-5’s “creativity level.”
It was the clarity, constraints and context in the prompt.How to Close the GPT-5 Prompt Gap
Whether you’re solo or running a team:
- **Define the role —**Tell GPT-5 exactly who it’s supposed to be.
“You are an experienced B2B copywriter specializing in SaaS product launches.” - Set clear constraints — Word count, tone, target audience, format. \ **“Write a 600-word blog post for startup founders that…”
- Layer in context — Past work, brand voice guidelines, product details.
-
Iterate intentionally — Improve one prompt instead of hopping between new ones.
Case Study: Closing the Gap in a Real Campaign
Last quarter, I worked with a small SaaS startup that had just started experimenting with AI-generated content. They were frustrated — “It sounds robotic” was their biggest complaint.
They were prompting like this:
“Write a blog post about why our software is good for small businesses.”
We re-engineered the prompt to:
- Set the role (a SaaS industry analyst writing for small business owners).
- Specify constraints (800 words, 3 subheads, casual yet authoritative tone).
- Include context (product features, customer pain points, brand voice examples).
The result?
A blog series that went live in under two weeks, drove 40% more organic traffic than their average post, and converted at 2.5x their previous rate.Same model. Same team. Different prompts.
Where This is Headed
Over the next 6–12 months, I expect:
-
Workflow Consolidation
AI will move from single-task assistants to full process managers. Think entire marketing funnels, from research to copy to distribution, in one workflow. -
Prompt Libraries as Infrastructure
The best teams will treat prompt libraries the way they treat SOPs, essential business assets. -
Hybrid Human-AI Creative Teams
New roles like “Prompt Strategist” or “AI Workflow Architect” will become as standard as “Content Manager.” -
Higher Audience Expectations
Audiences will expect AI-assisted content to bebetter, not just faster.Why This is Good News for the Prepared
If you close the Prompt Gap now, GPT-5 becomes:
- A speed advantage.
- A quality advantage.
- A positioning advantage.
If you don’t, you’ll be in the same spot as the GPT-3.5 laggards. Watching everyone else reap the rewards.
Over the last year and a half, I’ve been using ChatGPT and other LLMs in real client work. This includes across blog posts, lead gen, social content, proposals and product creation.
I didn’t just collect prompts. I refined them. Tested them. Kept only the ones that worked repeatedly under real-world conditions.
The result was a personal prompt library that consistently:
- Eliminated the blank-screen problem.
- Produced publish-ready content in one or two drafts.
- Adapted easily to different industries and audiences.
Eventually, I decided to share it publicly as The Prompt Vault — 15,000+ tested prompts for entrepreneurs, marketers, and creators.
It’s not just a list. It’s 18 months of trial-and-error. Compressed into a resource designed to close The Prompt Gap for anyone using GPT-5 (or whatever comes next).
The Takeaway
The GPT-5 backlash isn’t proof the model is flawed. It’s proof that most people are still prompting like it’s 2022.
Close The Prompt Gap now. And you won’t just be an early adopter, you’ll be an early leader.
Over to you: I’ve compiled my best-performing prompts from 18 months of real-world use into
The Prompt Vault. It’s a resource built to help entrepreneurs, marketers and creators turn GPT-5 into a high-output partner from day one.
